That would tend to explain the general uniformity of these tablets. I’m beginning to suspect that man budget tablets get their touchscreen from the same source and are built in the same factories. I suppose that might be too vague for some, but touchscreens are a solved problem for Android tablets. The touchscreen worked about as well as I expected. That’s okay, but it’s a little short when compared to other tablets in this price range. I tested this on a trip, and I usually got around 4 to 5 hours of steady use. The specs on the box claim 8 hours battery life, but I didn’t get that much. I can’t get the installed camera app to work, and the several camera apps I downloaded from Google Play also do not work.
BLUEFIRE READER ANDROID ERROR STREAM PROBLEM DRIVER
Unfortunately, there seems to be a driver issue. That’s much better than you would expect on a tablet in this price range and I was hoping it would be the first one to offer a decent image. The one thing that set this tablet apart (and this is why i bought it) was the 1.3MP camera.
There’s not much to set it apart from the competition, and I feel that if you happened to grab this tablet out of a bag full of similarly priced tablets, you’d be getting neither the best nor the worst of the bunch. This is an unremarkable tablet with average performance and adequate build quality. It has generally unremarkable specs, with the standard 7″ capacitive touchscreen, 8GB Flash storage, a microSD card slot, Wifi, g-sensor, and it is running Android 4.0 on a 1.2GHz CPU.
The Visual Land Connect tablet is one I happened across on Walmart, where it wa spriced right in the middle of the many $90 to $100 budget 7″ Android tablet. Many, many Android tablets have hit the market in the past year or so, including ones from truly unknown companies.